Thunar: trash:/// != ~/.Trash?

[Brian J. Tarricone]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/27/2006 2:17 PM, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Mike.
> 
> Mike Massonnet schrieb:
>>> If Thunar would offer the features I’m missing from Nautilus and
>>> remain fast as it is, then I would make it my default file browser.
>>>
>>   What features?
> 
> 1) Customizable icons for directories. I always set the cover of music albums
>    for their directory, for example.

That would be cool, though I'm not sure Benny will want to add something
like that.

> 2) Bigger thumbnails for images. Thunar keeps images at the maximum dimensions
>    of the current icon size. Nautilus shows them a lot larger so that you can
>    actually see something.

I guess you're asking more for an additional 'thumbnail view'.

> 3) Automatic generation of thumbnails for videos. Thunar only shows thumbnails
>    which were generated while visiting the directory they are in with Nautilus.

This works on my box.  Thunar needs to be compiled with gconf support so
it can get the list of video thumbnailers.

> 4) Actually allow .torrent files to be dropped over Azureus so that it will get
>    added to the list. At the moment the dialog to add files only pops out for a
>    short moment and disappears again. The file won’t get added.

Sounds like a bug in azureus.

> 5) A less clunky interface. Nothing against the GNOME HIG, but a border size of
>    6px is way too fat for me.

If it's just the 6px border that's bugging you, this seems like a silly
reason not to use thunar.  If there are other things that are actually
valid unintuitive, "clunky" UI, please do tell.

	-brian

P.S.  Thunar has its own dedicated development mailing list.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFGu3S6XyW6VEeAnsRAodAAKCCKiwJaCvTVCmTuonjy8EwwOi8cwCcD8DB
7HU8e00nfUZ2arr6951b+zk=
=xpp5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----