Thunar: trash:/// != ~/.Trash?

[Nick Schermer]

2006/9/27, Mathias Brodala <info at noctus.net>:
> Hello Mike.
>
> Mike Massonnet schrieb:
> > Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:14:39 +0200 - Mathias Brodala <info at noctus.net>
> > wrote :
> >> Stefan Stuhr wrote:
> >>> >From the FreeDesktop.org Trash specification [1]:
> >> Heh, I already expected something like this. I guess I have to try if
> >> symlinking ~/.Trash to ~/.local/share/Trash/files works.
> >>
> >
> >   Read the spec again.  It won't work because the trash spec expect a
> > folder to store the files and information about the trashed files.
>
> I know. But Nautilus doesn't need those information. It just plain moves the
> files to ~/.Trash and forgets about them. Heck, it even cannot restore them.
>
> >> If Thunar would offer the features I'm missing from Nautilus and
> >> remain fast as it is, then I would make it my default file browser.
> >>
> >
> >   What features?
>
> 1) Customizable icons for directories. I always set the cover of music albums
>    for their directory, for example.

So they look like images?? (aaaarg thunar opens an image, onooo it's a folder)

>
> 2) Bigger thumbnails for images. Thunar keeps images at the maximum dimensions
>    of the current icon size. Nautilus shows them a lot larger so that you can
>    actually see something.

Thunar != Image viewer

>
> 3) Automatic generation of thumbnails for videos. Thunar only shows thumbnails
>    which were generated while visiting the directory they are in with Nautilus.

Compile with gconf-2.0 (gnome-thumbnailer)

>
> 4) Actually allow .torrent files to be dropped over Azureus so that it will get
>    added to the list. At the moment the dialog to add files only pops out for a
>    short moment and disappears again. The file won't get added.
>

Thunar can't do anything about this, it just passes the uri of the
file. More likely Azureus can't handle the standard.

> 5) A less clunky interface. Nothing against the GNOME HIG, but a border size of
>    6px is way too fat for me.
>

No comment, but small borders are not user-inferface-friendly.

> These are the things that keep me with Nautilus for now.
>

Greets,
Nick