xfwm problem?

[Vincent Groenewold]

lol Yep I know, it was all because of an improper way of beginning the
installation and probably because of those prefixes. If I just sticked with
the portage way (Gentoo) it would've gone just fine, didin't know however
that the beta2 version was already available via that way.

Cheerz, Vincent

On 16/07/06, Nikolas Arend <Nikolas.Arend at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Compiling doesn't replace anything. Installing does, but only files that
> were installed under the same prefix. For libraries you also have to run
> /sbin/ldconfig with a proper /etc/ld.so.conf to have them found correctly.
> Maybe you used different prefix's and now the old stuff is found before
> the new because of the respective entries in your PATH variable.
> Honestly, I rarely see anybody having so much trouble with an xfce
> installation ;-)
>
> Nick.
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20060717/65ba8979/attachment.html>