borderless window?

[Kristoffer]

On Mon, 16 May 2005 03:03:55 +0200, Brian J. Tarricone <bjt23 at cornell.edu>  
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kristoffer wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 May 2005 23:16:01 +0200, Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> and redo all the existing themes...
>>
>>
>> why? the border in gnome is still there no matter the theme... It  
>> doesn't
>> really matter how "thick" the theme chooses it's borders because at the
>> far left
>> or right; there is no theme, and so the
>> open-border-by-moving-mouse-to-far-left-and-click
>> still works.
>>
>> the reason I modified my theme was to see if i could get rid of all the
>> border; which
>> as you know, was fruitless..
>>
>> sorry for insisting, but i don't think you have to redo the existing
>> themes, and
>> it seems a bit weird to succumb because "i can't be bothered" ...  
>> atleast
>> put
>> it on the todo list so someone else can do so i don't have to tell the  
>> next
>> linux convert from windows that the functionality is a bit weird in  
>> linux
>> because
>> the developers couldn't be bothered..
>>
>> ach! do as you wish :/
>
> Repeat after me, ad nauseum, until you get it:
>
> "No one is under any obligation to code anything for me, and the
> developers may feel free to ignore my feature request if they aren't
> interested.  If I really really want my request implemented, I should do
> it myself, or find (and pay, if necessary) someone else willing and able
> to do it."
>
> Really, this belief by many people here that we're obligated to do what
> you want is getting old.
>
> 	-brian
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCh/F76XyW6VEeAnsRAkGFAKC6wF2QlbM8nyIUapkzFZ/T+2gKdgCgtkON
> 8beWHOuW3cpNIw2zr53Ho4g=
> =mjsg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
>
>
i seem to recall myself saying "do as you wish" and the only reason i  
didn't
include the "you don't owe me anything" speech, which i thought of  
including
for a while, was because i thought it would be an insult to the devs  
intelligence
to have to tell them that they have a free will of their own...

guess i was mistaken, from here-on now i'll start talking politically  
correct
and be humble when i'm not and we can all live in this fake world untill  
we all
have our heads so far up our asses that we can no longer discern between  
what's
real and not.

but we'll be happy-dumb, until it boils over for someone which starts
killing people in  a nearby mall/school

just remember: i never said the person _had_ to do it, i just said i  
thought
it was weird/etc... you don't have to listen to me; and should i have  
"demanded"
anything your free to do with what i said in whichever way you wanted... or
atleast that's how i see it.

it gets a bit hard to talk with someone when one can't call a stool for a  
stool
without insulting someone...

"power is the only real principle" ...
-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/