Dumb Question

Olivier Fourdan fourdan at xfce.org
Sat Jan 15 16:17:04 CET 2005


Hi Bruce,

I'll provide an rpm for xfwm4 with the compositor enabled in the
rpm/extras/ directory.

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 09:53 -0500, Bruce Miller wrote:
> Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > Dennis J. Tuchler wrote:
> > 
> >> I will be grabbing XFCE when it comes out in final form this weekend.  
> >> Being a belt-and-suspenders type (very risk averse) I have an 
> >> elementary question before I start:
> >>
> >> I notice that there are two installers for XFCE.  One is for XFCE and 
> >> the other is for GTK+XFCE engine.  What is the difference between the 
> >> two?  I don't think I need both.
> > 
> > 
> > The gtk2-xfce-engine-installer contains the Xfce Gtk+ Theme Engine, 
> > whereas the xfce4-installer contains the Xfce Desktop. They are separate 
> > because the Gtk+ Theme Engine has to be installed in the same prefix as 
> > Gtk+ itself, whereupon Xfce can be installed basicly everywhere on your 
> > system.
> 
> A similar question that occured to me: I see that fedora rpms will (probably)
> be available as well; does xfwm4 come with the compositing support enabled,
> or do we need to compile from source for that?
> 
> If the latter, it would be good to clarify that somewhere; probably on the
> download page, rather than the announcement, but ...
> I hesititate to bring this up so soon before release, but it will probably
> solve some mysteries for people...
> 
> [I've installed 4.1.99.3-1, which _seems_ not to have it enabled... or else
> I've got something misconfigured]
> 
> Thanks; and looking forward to 4.2!
> Bruce
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
> 





More information about the Xfce mailing list