xfce version 3 vs. 4 : missing features?
Net Llama!
netllama at linux-sxs.org
Mon Sep 29 15:12:49 CEST 2003
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Biju Chacko wrote:
> > Sigh. Too many folks in the (ahem!) "high-tech" industry forget that while
> > all progress involves change, not all change is progress.
>
> Fer chrissake, try it out before making the snarky comments! It's rather
> disheartening to have over a year and a half worth of work so casually
> dismissed, especially by people like you, Rich, whom we counted as our strongest
> supporters. :-(
These complaints are not late breaking news. I personally complained
about a lot of these things months ago, and was blown off. Check the list
archives if you don't believe me.
> Things have changed, yes, but you *should* be able to configure a desktop pretty
> much the same as you used to have, except for minor changes and major
> improvements.
What you term "minor changes" aren't minor for those who preferred doing
them the XFCE3 way. Blowing this off yet again isn't winning your
argument. I still can't understand why some of this stuff was changed,
other than by the whim of the developers.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
More information about the Xfce
mailing list