xscreensaver

[Heiko Berges]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:53:30PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 01/17/03 18:39, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 18:14, Collins wrote:
> > 
> >> > 	Can we try and trim excess lines when replying?  It would make 
> >> > things easier to read.

Ack.  

> >> And this!  I for one don't care whether the message is from the real Joe
> >> Klemmer or an impostor, but I get to read the gnupg trash on every
> >> posting.
> > 
> > 	Man, don't start with me.  You are trying to compare 9 lines to
> > messages with well over 50 lines.  And since most people read email with
> > something other than mailx, the gpg signature is virtually invisible. 
> 
> virtually invisible?  well, now that you turned it off, sure.

The visibility is not the problem, the transmission of the data is
the problem, since most people outside the USA pay internet access 
per volume or per minute.  But if Joe or anybody else thinks he needs
to sign his messages, it's O.K. with me. 

Really annoying are postings consisting of one line posted on top of 
100 lines of quoted personal sigs, gpg sigs and mailing list sigs, 
with broken references and missing attribution line. Especially when 
trying to read the archives.

	
	just my two cents,
	Heiko