[Thunar-dev] Fwd: Gnome is trying to decrease memory usage.

Xiong Jiang linuster at gmail.com
Fri Sep 30 18:25:57 CEST 2005

It's just my personal preference. :) Some people like GTK more while some
like QT more. Whichever they like, they always can express their preference.
It's not about the business to _evaluate_ the toolkit.

IMHO C++ _is_ a little profounded (or in my awkard English, bloated) in
features as a language. That's why Java and C# are created and become

Again, this is just MHO. Please do not take it as "bussiness of evaluating

Have fun,

On 9/29/05, Brian J. Tarricone <bjt23 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On 9/29/2005 10:19 AM, Xiong Jiang wrote:
> > I am just a user not a programmer of software based on GTK+ but I feel
> > very sorry if GTK+ is on the track like what you guys expressed in this
> > thread. I like GTK a lot as I always prefer C over bloated (somehow) C++
> > language. And GTK did very neat work too. I would think that many other
> > people like GTK+ as me too.
> At the risk of sounding like an elitist ass (not that this would be the
> first time), if you think C++ is "bloated", you have no business
> evaluating the merits of a GUI toolkit.
> -brian
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> iD8DBQFDPHMh6XyW6VEeAnsRArbfAJ9lJscJF/19wjVCmL5EQAEfHtmxDACg8Jg+
> IxwyxutlfyryVa+NqoQfqYA=
> =Dr8X
> _______________________________________________
> Thunar-dev mailing list
> Thunar-dev at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/thunar-dev/attachments/20050930/4f65c085/attachment.html>

More information about the Thunar-dev mailing list