[Thunar-dev] Website

Brian brian-schott at cox.net
Fri Jun 3 15:47:48 CEST 2005


Henrik Andersen wrote:

>On 6/6/05, Ticex <ticex at idgmail.se> wrote:
>  
>
>>Nick Schermer wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I just made these. Consider them public domain. If you'd like it
>>>resized/recolored/whatever just let me know.
>>>The icon look a bit weird when they are small (<15px) and i think for
>>>the thunar view
>>>it's good to use the same icons as in the thunar screenshots.
>>>
>>>I've created 2 new mokups, just tell what you think.
>>>
>>>http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/nickschermer/
>>>
>>>Catch you on the flip side, Xerverius
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>i did like makeup 3 best.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Thunar-dev mailing list
>>Thunar-dev at xfce.org
>>http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Out of the three, I find number 3 the most visually appealing. Number
>2 looks a bit too informative (geeky) to be used as a website for a
>file manager branding itself as user-friendly, IMO. I'm actually not
>sure, but I think no. 3's appeal is because of the Viking looking
>better in that one than in no. 1.
>
>I think if we're using number 3, we could experiment with making it
>look like a GTK+ app, with the selected menu choice highlighted,
>excessive use of icons, etc, as the design already mimics Thunar's UI
>pretty closely.
>
>And I'm sorry about not having done any designing. I'm still busy with school.
>_______________________________________________
>Thunar-dev mailing list
>Thunar-dev at xfce.org
>http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
>
>  
>
I agree. Design 3 looks the best. I created the icon for the website in
case there were permission problems with the gnome icons (Which I don't
think there will be)



More information about the Thunar-dev mailing list