[Thunar-dev] next step in thunar development

[Jeff Franks]

Benedikt Meurer wrote:

>Jeff Franks wrote:
>  
>
>>Benny,
>>
>>I've been going through thunar.xmi and the layout seems to look good, 
>>but I do have a question about ThunarView. The name is confusing because 
>>"View" is usually applied to a physical widget, such as you have done 
>>with ThunarTreeView and ThunarIconView, but ThunarView is an interface. 
>>Is it really needed? If so, for consistency wouldn't it be better to 
>>give it a name that ended in "Model", like ThunarWindowModel or something.
>>    
>>
>
>No, a model provides access to data, while a view provides a view of a 
>model, which is exactly what ThunarView (or better it's subclasses do).
>
>  
>
Then ThunarView is an abtract base class not a GtkTreeModel, but it 
implements the ThunarListModel interface. What does ThunarView derive from?

Jeff.