<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Hi Jarno,<br></div><div dir="auto">I don't think the problem is Simon blocking the project, the problem is that there is no one at the moment maintaining the components Simon used to maintain.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I can try to review your Merge Request as soon as I have some spare time (offline life hasn't been easy for me lately), although it would really really help me (or someone else interested in review) if you could make smaller Merge Requests, I mean, fixing one problem at a time, it reduces the risks of breaking stuff and requires smaller reviewing/testing sessions that are easier to find time.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Finally, thanks for your contribution and bringing this up on the mailing list, I hope we can merge your work as soon as possible, emphasis on the "possible" :)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,<br></div><div>Andre Miranda<br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 8, 2022, 06:51 by sunijarno@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Is there anyone else to review, test or accept my merge request<br></div><div>besides Simon Steinbeiß? It seems that he does not have time,<br></div><div>motivation or skill to do that. It is sad, if one person can block the<br></div><div>development of the project. I have orientated myself in POSIX shell<br></div><div>scripting. If you think there are too big risks in merging or if you<br></div><div>think the current way is better, please rationalize.<br></div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:04 PM Jarno Suni <sunijarno@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div><br></div><div>So my merge request has been around for a while:<br></div><div>https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-session/-/merge_requests/20<br></div><div>Apparently it has not had much attention. Is the merge request still<br></div><div>somehow too difficult for reviewers? Should we have a configuration<br></div><div>setting for time after which a non-forking locker is regarded as<br></div><div>having locked successfully? (Currently it is fixed 1 s.)<br></div><div><br></div><div>I have not created a separate wrapper script for DPMS features that I<br></div><div>removed from xflock4 due to feedback from Simon Steinbeiss. Should<br></div><div>there be one? Should it be configurable by command line options or by<br></div><div>xfconf settings?<br></div></blockquote><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Xfce4-dev mailing list<br></div><div>Xfce4-dev@xfce.org<br></div><div>https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>