Feature: fix borders for misbehaving applications
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
lkml at metux.net
Thu Oct 20 17:41:51 CEST 2022
On 20.10.22 16:58, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> So the will of some corporations like Microsoft counts a lot more to you
> than the user's will ?
>
>
> Who writes or publishes the application is irrelevant.
It becomes relevant as soon as the user has no chance to get it fixed.
> And users should not have the freedom to get a consistent UI ?
>
> I am saying that if there is a bug in an application, the application
> should be fixed,
Right, it *should*. But that just won't happen.
But as it sounds that you're in possession of the wisdom how to fix
those rogue applications, please share it with us.
> rather than adding tons of code in the WM to work
> around whatever applications do.
Tons of code ?! It's two lines of actual code, one if(...) and one
FLAG_SET(..), plus 2 just for the code nice formatting.
Did you ever *actually* *read* my patch ?
> And you don't like users being able to move around windows of hanging
> applications easily ?
>
> /me shrugs and moves on.
Indeed an actual real world problem. Formerly just a typical MS-Windows
only problem (since X window managers aren't blocked by misbehaving
clients) - with CSD this class of problems was now introduced into the
Unix / X11 world.
--mtx
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info at metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list