notification problmes

[Andrea]

with 1.5.2 (and also 1.5.1) version when i change brightness with wheel 
mouse over the icon of the power manager, appears a notification (very 
very small, is larger 2-3 pixels only) without content inside


Il 23/06/2015 12:00, xfce4-dev-request at xfce.org ha scritto:
> Send Xfce4-dev mailing list submissions to
> 	xfce4-dev at xfce.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	xfce4-dev-request at xfce.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	xfce4-dev-owner at xfce.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Xfce4-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering (killermoehre)
>     2. Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering
>        (flo.xfce at gmx-topmail.de)
>     3. Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering (OmegaPhil)
>     4. Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering (Niki Kovacs)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:22:26 +0200
> From: killermoehre <killermoehre at gmx.net>
> To: info at microlinux.fr,Xfce development list <xfce4-dev at xfce.org>
> Subject: Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering
> Message-ID: <06198BC0-72B0-493C-86EB-B347FDBF2EB7 at gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am 22. Juni 2015 09:44:12 MESZ, schrieb Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm maintaining a package repository for an enhanced Xfce desktop based
>>
>> on Slackware Linux.
>>
>> http://www.microlinux.fr/microlinux/
>>
>> I have a question about version numbering. The xfce4-mixer package I
>> have in my repo is version 4.10.0. Now the latest source tarball is
>> 4.11.0. Is this a regular release? Or does the odd number eventually
>> mean a development version? I'm a bit confused.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Niki Kovacs
> Hello Niki,
>
> yes, xfce4-mixer 4.11 is a dev release [1]. OTOH with the deprecation of gstreamer0.10 xfce4-mixer was also deprecated in favor of xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin and pavucontrol.
>
> Regards
> killermoehre
>
> [1] https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce-announce/2014-April/000321.html
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: APG v1.1.1
>
> iQJCBAEBCgAsBQJVh+/yJRxTaWx2aW8gS25pemVrIDxzaWx2aW8ua25pemVrQGdt
> eC5kZT4ACgkQXmS59We7BD/Q6g//X1fxvkslIQ1EAkjm6PRMDjXopdcO0ZO3w9tu
> ciDduA6zQYGHcM2krDvWzSDs4gN9Zd6cNiCDyS473KPuQ8bAoywj2u9PIjwSOPm2
> GehGk5SSuEggAYKlCGhoM5GfZMvKgg8EztEsWNARz+fSwOhnJR7jJgutFklb+ChU
> d0PdXHSwUaewbwOagRNfgvbS5i63vQ09OJjxv2JW1mun+4HZ/vsUzEOQdMT1Fr0I
> 7i7vRFlgr2Ty1vvtBolBNgZ9SQsxid3K1kzxpnTm3AVBzEl2UUXz1l8pHzOKNaDK
> 8G4MDf253aO8a3I7gJ6o4VR2JWzLqHHGugVk+KrYJVJCq7LVvsEH8zxmC375I+6f
> R65d23K9wH19D7JN6qkY5PooTzyCYWbK3bVinpAA68V5Uwb271OoxNJQh9sDpi/l
> Ga6zrUiTmtE3fh/GfeKnxenBY06ENgh1v+5h8iBEmNwg1gGVrB7xC+Tk7XXZBT95
> X81bLuWN7PbmYdcQPDjRlKN3ndONksHtEZqWe9zd3XHppCDifU8GhsAZBKsRNZ2H
> /5sMHaZW5IbJ0gcloMf6ULuAi8vLO1BPSBsd8vzNJmLuF9XiFwaL+1zjQDobiXF4
> UyuO4lENbFPWpaiXfOVeoFzgw/BNNWz29jm4WThFaHY7Vg8AFyBKAYgxTEYdqhCl
> zGVQ9T4=
> =Wbk/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:32:18 +0200
> From: flo.xfce at gmx-topmail.de
> To: xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> Subject: Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering
> Message-ID: <5587F242.9040200 at gmx-topmail.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> To be correct: The reason xfce4-mixer is no longer under active
> development is that a port to the new gstreamer1.0 API is not possible
> since important mixer features were removed (not deprecated).
> Although the uneven numbers indicate development versions, Xfce 4.11 can
> be considered stable because of the long time it took to finish 4.12.
> Some distributions added 4.11 to their stable repos (like Ubuntu). So no
> point worrying.
> xfce4-mixer 4.11 works well with the 4.12 release. At this point there
> is no reason for switching to pavucontrol apart from personal preference.
>
> Regards
>
> On 06/22/2015 01:22 PM, killermoehre wrote:
>> Am 22. Juni 2015 09:44:12 MESZ, schrieb Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm maintaining a package repository for an enhanced Xfce desktop based
>>> on Slackware Linux.
>>> http://www.microlinux.fr/microlinux/
>>> I have a question about version numbering. The xfce4-mixer package I
>>> have in my repo is version 4.10.0. Now the latest source tarball is
>>> 4.11.0. Is this a regular release? Or does the odd number eventually
>>> mean a development version? I'm a bit confused.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Niki Kovacs
>> Hello Niki,
>>
>> yes, xfce4-mixer 4.11 is a dev release [1]. OTOH with the deprecation of gstreamer0.10 xfce4-mixer was also deprecated in favor of xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin and pavucontrol.
>>
>> Regards
>> killermoehre
>>
>> [1] https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce-announce/2014-April/000321.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xfce4-dev mailing list
>> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
>> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:11:24 +0100
> From: OmegaPhil <OmegaPhil at startmail.com>
> To: Xfce development list <xfce4-dev at xfce.org>
> Subject: Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering
> Message-ID: <5588097C.5090000 at startmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Thanks for this information - does this mean XFCE4 is tending towards
> (e.g. v4.13+) a hard dependency on pulse audio? That is banned on my
> system (I have a perfectly working ALSA setup).
>
>
> On 22/06/15 12:32, flo.xfce at gmx-topmail.de wrote:
>> To be correct: The reason xfce4-mixer is no longer under active
>> development is that a port to the new gstreamer1.0 API is not possible
>> since important mixer features were removed (not deprecated).
>> Although the uneven numbers indicate development versions, Xfce 4.11 can
>> be considered stable because of the long time it took to finish 4.12.
>> Some distributions added 4.11 to their stable repos (like Ubuntu). So no
>> point worrying.
>> xfce4-mixer 4.11 works well with the 4.12 release. At this point there
>> is no reason for switching to pavucontrol apart from personal preference.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On 06/22/2015 01:22 PM, killermoehre wrote:
>>> Am 22. Juni 2015 09:44:12 MESZ, schrieb Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I'm maintaining a package repository for an enhanced Xfce desktop based
>>>> on Slackware Linux.
>>>> http://www.microlinux.fr/microlinux/
>>>> I have a question about version numbering. The xfce4-mixer package I
>>>> have in my repo is version 4.10.0. Now the latest source tarball is
>>>> 4.11.0. Is this a regular release? Or does the odd number eventually
>>>> mean a development version? I'm a bit confused.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Niki Kovacs
>>> Hello Niki,
>>>
>>> yes, xfce4-mixer 4.11 is a dev release [1]. OTOH with the deprecation of gstreamer0.10 xfce4-mixer was also deprecated in favor of xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin and pavucontrol.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> killermoehre
>>>
>>> [1] https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce-announce/2014-April/000321.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xfce4-dev mailing list
>>> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
>>> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xfce4-dev mailing list
>> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
>> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20150622/5b1915c6/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:32:18 +0200
> From: Niki Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>
> To: xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> Subject: Re: xfce4-mixer: question about version numbering
> Message-ID: <55880E62.1070706 at microlinux.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> Le 22/06/2015 13:32, flo.xfce at gmx-topmail.de a ?crit :
>> xfce4-mixer 4.11 works well with the 4.12 release. At this point there
>> is no reason for switching to pavucontrol apart from personal preference.
> Slackware only includes ALSA (amixer, alsamixer, ...), but doesn't ship
> with Pulseaudio.
>
> Niki
>