[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 11600] Actual Xfce version - 4.11

[Steve Dodier-Lazaro]

I closed the bug report because it doesn't matter *now*, since we are
releasing 4.12. It just takes more developer time to push a fix that was no
longer needed.

If you look at libxfce4util's history, there are no archive branches for
development releases. Only stables and master. This makes me suspect Nick
intentionally did not bump the version number, or that he didn't care to
double-check because that would not matter. I can point him out here, and
appreciate you raising the issue but we will not be needing to apply the
patch since a 4.12 version of libxfce4util is on its way.

Thanks.

On 26 February 2015 at 12:42, <bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org> wrote:

> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11600
>
> poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
>          Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---
>
> --- Comment #2 from poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> ---
> (In reply to Steve Dodier-Lazaro from comment #1)
> > The patch is not relevant any more as 4.12 will be out this week-end,
> and I
> > suspect this was left to 4.10 on purpose.
> >
> > Closing this issue.
>
> Care to explain before closing?
> "left to 4.10 on purpose" explanation is not.
> What is actual reason for string not to follow actual development versions?
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce-bugs mailing list
> Xfce-bugs at xfce.org
> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-bugs
>



-- 
Steve Dodier-Lazaro
PhD Student
University College London
Free Software Developer
OpenPGP : 1B6B1670
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20150227/f401a3ee/attachment.html>