Question about relicensing of exo code

Yves-Alexis Perez corsac at
Fri Nov 5 15:31:00 CET 2010

On ven., 2010-11-05 at 14:34 +0100, Xavier D. wrote:
> It's a bit complicated these stories of licenses.
> If I correctly understand what you mean, thunar-vfs is GLPv2 + LGPLv2 ? 

thunar-vfs is LGPLv2. exo-hal was (wrongly, aiui) GPLv2. So you can't
import (and link) it into thunar-vfs without making thunar-vfs GPLv2

> But Benedikt told in a previous email it's 'only' LGPL.

Yes, exo-hal was wrongly licensed, it seems...

> Finally, I'm not sure which way to choose.

You don't have to choose.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list