Release manager feeds

[Jannis Pohlmann]

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:52:42 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann <jannis at xfce.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:39:53 +0200
> Nick Schermer <nickschermer at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 2009/7/24 Brian J. Tarricone <brian at tarricone.org>:
> > > On 07/23/2009 11:16 PM, David Mohr wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So in particular:
> > >> - The user submitted message should go first, not the checksums
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> > 
> > Well I agree on that if we don't include changelogs or put them
> > below the links.
> > 
> > > As much as I hate to suggest it, we probably should only include
> > > mocha in the initial announcement.  Maybe Auke can set up a
> > > 'main.xfce.org' or 'archive.xfce.org' alias for mocha as well so
> > > we aren't using the machine's internal hostname in public
> > > announcements.
> > 
> > Why don't we put the tarballs under release.xfce.org and get rid of
> > the archive folder on the main website?
> 
> After having used it for two weaks, I think that release.xfce.org
> sucks. It should be releases.xfce.org ;)

And it is now: the release manager has been moved to
https://releases.xfce.org/, the feeds (which still need to be improved
because the feed update implement is quite buggy) are available via
http://releases.xfce.org/.

  - Jannis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20090724/850aac73/attachment.pgp>