Libxfce4ui api review

[Nick Schermer]

2009/7/7 Brian J. Tarricone <brian at tarricone.org>:
> On 2009/07/07 02:59, Nick Schermer wrote:
>> Looked a bit through eggsm and I think we should use it, looks clean
>> and contains everything we need. Put it a private library named
>> libxfce4smclient-private (like libxfce4kbd-private) with the xsmp (and
>> maybe osx) backend. Make sure it works with xfce4-session and then sit
>> and wait what gtk+ is going to do.
>> Hopefully others agree with this. IMHO we simply don't think we have
>> the resources (and are in the position) of re-thinking the whole sm
>> backend.
>
> I hate having private libs, but that's probably the best idea for now.

Should I also rename the public egg_sm_client code to xfce_sm_client
or is that not needed? I don't think that will bring any benefit for
us since it's private and temporarily anyway. Also slightly more work
to keep us up2date with the original egg code.

Nick