[Xfce4-commits] r29572 - in xfwm4/trunk: . settings-dialogs
Jannis Pohlmann
jannis at xfce.org
Tue Feb 24 21:58:09 CET 2009
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:55:58 +0100
Jannis Pohlmann <jannis at xfce.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:43:44 +0000
> Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Nick Schermer
> > <nickschermer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2009/2/24 Olivier Fourdan <olivier at xfce.org>:
> > >> Author: olivier
> > >> Date: 2009-02-24 18:53:37 +0000 (Tue, 24 Feb 2009)
> > >> New Revision: 29572
> > >>
> > >> Modified:
> > >> xfwm4/trunk/ChangeLog
> > >> xfwm4/trunk/settings-dialogs/tweaks-settings.c
> > >> xfwm4/trunk/settings-dialogs/xfwm4-settings.c
> > >> Log:
> > >> * settings-dialogs/xfwm4-settings.c,
> > >> settings-dialogs/tweaks-settings.c: Do not run setting
> > >> dialogs if current window manager is not xfwm4 (Bug #4989).
> > >
> > > I think the error will be confusing since it won't show up in a
> > > dialog. IMHO we make string freeze exception and make this
> > > translatable showing in a message dialog, or drop it.
> > >
> > > We could also add a hook in the settings manager, not showing the
> > > xfwm4 settings if xfwm4 is not running, but then it'll still be
> > > accessible from the menu. Probably not a good idea... Maybe
> > > implement a TryExec thing in the future?
> >
> > Remember, this is to fix a crash, see bug #4989 - But I am not
> > personally interested much in fixing the crash, not even
> > investigating too much (I don't feel too concerned if
> > xfce4-settings is started from gnome and segfaults - But it should
> > not segfault, it's ugly)
> >
> > Beside this is to fix a regression that was introduced in 4.6, and
> > moreover xfce4-panel swettings dialog behaves jut the same, it
> > spews a error message to the console and fails to start if the
> > panel is not running. So at least we are consistent betweem modules
> > ^_~
> >
> > I am not really fond of reverting this, but I agree this is not a
> > the best of all fixes, but at least it fixes a segfault... But it
> > is not critical, so I am ok if this is not part of 4.6 (but this is
> > really a trivial fix, the code was there since 4.2 or so so I
> > consider it well tested)
>
> I'd say we leave it as it is and fix it properly in trunk next week ;)
I mean, use your current fix for 4.6. Not the segfault.
- Jannis
segfault.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20090224/736d04df/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list