Xfce documentation licensing

[Jannis Pohlmann]

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:19:10 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac at debian.org> wrote:

> On mar, 2009-08-18 at 12:19 +0200, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> > I don't remember exactly why we (I?) chose GPLv2, but I think it may
> > have been to simply have the same license as for the code and there
> > being no compelling reason to choose anything else.
> 
> It's usually a good idea to have the same version on both so one can
> re-use code snippets in the docs.

Most code snippets I've used in the past were written especially for
the docs, so I'm not really concerned about this.

  - Jannis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20090820/ce8ceaea/attachment.pgp>