fourdan at xfce.org
Sat Sep 9 12:00:27 CEST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Jani Monoses wrote:
>> were there any issues with exo in the past which make it still an
>> optional component of Xfce? I thought abiut this seeing Jean-Francois'
>> last commit to the menueditor, with non-trivial additions on both
>> branches of #ifdef LIBEXO.
>> Are there enough users who opt not to build their xfce apps with exo?
> Dunno. I guess building xfdesktop w/o exo doesn't make sense except for
> a few people that don't use desktop icons and care for every byte of RAM
> being used (tho, if you care for each byte, you shouldn't run a desktop
> manager at all :-).
Agreed. But if xfdesktop is able to compile and run w/out exo, then it
should stay as is for 4.4.
I have no problem with making Exo mandatory for the forthcoming releases.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v220.127.116.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Xfce4-dev