exo optional?

[Olivier Fourdan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Jani Monoses wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> were there any issues with exo in the past which make it still an
>> optional component of Xfce? I thought abiut this seeing Jean-Francois'
>> last commit to the menueditor, with non-trivial additions on both
>> branches of #ifdef LIBEXO.
>>
>> Are there enough users who opt not to build their xfce apps with exo?
> 
> Dunno. I guess building xfdesktop w/o exo doesn't make sense except for
> a few people that don't use desktop icons and care for every byte of RAM
> being used (tho, if you care for each byte, you shouldn't run a desktop
> manager at all :-).
> 

Agreed. But if xfdesktop is able to compile and run w/out exo, then it
should stay as is for 4.4.

I have no problem with making Exo mandatory for the forthcoming releases.

Cheers,
Olivier.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFApC7FHBtvh5LRUARAvBBAKDmHAaJ5M+VwKR2noj2yZwWobV/fACeKEwl
fishUyXM3TpsumCviJ5Kjvw=
=Gkh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----