Should we keep xfterm4

[Olivier Fourdan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Now that both exo and Terminal are part of xfce, what's the use of
> xfterm4 anymore?
> 
> xfterm4 is a derivative of xfterm, a simple shell wrapper I added in
> xfce 3.x maybe 6 or 7 years ago...
> 
> Let's get rid of it. At last as it is right now. Let just keep a wrapper
> to "exo-open --launch TerminalEmulator"...

I forgot to mention that the current implementation fails because of the
"$ESTRING" and causes the following error...

Option "--execute/-x" requires specifying the command to run on the rest
of the command line

So we need to do something about that anyway, thus my proposal to over
simplify xfterm4.

Cheers,
Olivier.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFPRzYFHBtvh5LRUARAiqDAKCWdJpdguVUAN9veB7tNAFSBGo9tACdHHNb
vvGA5spvwhm6OPRwvqcVk30=
=w15g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----