Xarchiver version on RC2
pierceward at gmail.com
Sat Nov 4 17:14:27 CET 2006
It looks to me like those xarchiver bugs were fixed?
On 11/4/06, Stephan Arts <psybsd at gmail.com> wrote:
> I hope you don't mind me answering this one Giuseppe,
> Xarchiver trunk has a few critical bugs since 0.4.0.
> (like broken zip support and critical glib messages)
> So i think you better stick with Xarchiver 0.4.0.
> Did you know LinuxFormat has written an article about Xarchiver 0.4.0?
> On 11/4/06, Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > Hi Giuseppe,
> > Is the current version of Xarchiver ok for inclusion in xfce 4.4 RC2?
> > Knowing that only bug fixes should occur beyond RC2 (ideally, RC2 should
> > be the final or at least as colose as the final as possible).
> > TIA
> > Cheers,
> > Olivier.
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> > iD8DBQFFTKRqFHBtvh5LRUARAp6EAJ9xz5F07eJ32fKPcZc6IlO+hihUDgCgzTUg
> > HCl3Y/q+bBNbcHX4ehAt3Qg=
> > =jJum
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce4-dev mailing list
> > Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Xfce4-dev