xarchiver and thunar plugins

[Benedikt Meurer]

Jani Monoses wrote:
>>Nope that's the way it's meant to be. In a perfect world, we would also
>>add the file-roller.tap to file-roller and ark.tap to ark, but because
>>of the release cycle of that packages it would take too long to be
>>supported again.
> 
> Fair enough. Although I'd think that adding a tap to file-roller should
> not be a problem for gnome 2.16, but yes that's a few moths away.

Feel free to add it to file-roller (the wrapper could also be used for a
nautilus archive plugin), but that'd of course mean that once
file-roller is released, you'd need to add conflicts for older
thunar-archive-plugin packages.

> Jani

Benedikt