problems with svn xffm (including stacktrace)

Shayne O'Connor machinehasnoagenda at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 05:57:14 CET 2006


On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 02:38 +0000, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Shayne O'Connor wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:57 +0000, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Mr Machine wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> While i thought this was fixed ... it appears to be happening again :(
> >>>
> >>> I am using latest SVN.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is the traceback the same? Methinks it should be different...
> >
> >
> > that's what i woulda thought, too ... but to me they look much the same
> > (perhaps you'd be a better judge of that, though):
> >
> 
> yep, it's the same. It shouldn't be. I can no longer reproduce here. Do 
> you have a very fast machine? If so I'll implement plan B.

my machine has:

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
512MB RAM

i tried compiling xffm with enable-debug=full, but got errors ... would
full debugging help more?

shayne




More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list