xfrun4 + dbus

[Benedikt Meurer]

Jani Monoses wrote:
> Ok, so there are two approaches so far:
> 
> 1) patch existing xfrun to optionally use dbus and if no service is 
> detected behave exactly as now. This needs minimal changes as seen in 
> the patch above. However the advantages only show up when some app 
> implements said service.
> 
> 2) make an xfrun-backround process with all the current code, and add a 
> new small process which just calls it. The disadvantage I see here is 
> dbus dependency is no longer optional for this feature and needs two 
> extra apps besides xfrun itself.
> 
> both of these will make the run dialog pop up almost instantly so I am 
> fine with putting a patch in bugzilla for either of these approaches.

I'd prefer 2) because it's less hacky, but 1) would be ok as quick&dirty
work-around for 4.4. We can do 2) for 4.6 then.

> Jani

Benedikt