Olivier Fourdan wrote: >>3.90.1? ;-) > > Err, 4.3.90.1 ? However you may want to follow your own versionning > scheme for Thunar (that would make sense to have 1.0 and not 4.4 for > Thunar :) Yep, will be 0.8 or 1.0, not sure yet, as its far away from 4.4. ;-) > /me redo the maths ;) Heh. > Cheers, > Olivier. Benedikt