mcs replaced in 4.6?

[Brian J. Tarricone]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Jani Monoses wrote:
> 
>>>Quoting Brian's blog
>>>
>>>'MCS should not be used for "normal" applications, and is expected to be
>>>replaced in Xfce 4.6 anyway'
>>>
>>>what is it expected to be replaced with?
> 
> 
> Something else.  Seriously, who knows?  If Uniconf works out and makes
> sense, maybe that.  Or that other one that that annoying guy on xdg at fd.o
> keeps posting about.  Or maybe we'll write our own if those aren't suitable.

Just a further note: if no other configuration system seems suitable,
and no one has the time or inclination to write a new system, then we'll
continue to use MCS.  Really, it's all kinda up in the air.

	-b

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDg0Pm6XyW6VEeAnsRAhL7AKCL9cIvYsB+dzJJxWnnS1yK5zWQ/wCfZHLK
5Tpd2hLIXCnaPdTacuH0yh8=
=XHfy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----