benedikt.meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de
Thu Jun 9 22:21:03 CEST 2005
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:24 -0700, Don Christensen wrote:
>>I think that making the intelligent window placement a selectable
>>option would be relatively easy and could help with benchmarks.
>>And heck, someone might even prefer the non-intelligent placement
> Actually, I'm really considering removing the smart placement. Not
> because it makes things slower, but because I come to the conclusion
> that when I run an application, I expect it to appear where my eyes
> look, and that's generally in the middle of the screen...
> I sometimes have to search the new windows because they are placed
> So I'm thinking of an different algorithm, a lot simpler, and more
I didn't plan to add my opinion to this thread initially. But I think, I
should mention that xfwm4's placement algorithm is one of its strengths,
esp. with xinerama setups.
Dunno about the quality your "simpler, more usable algorithm", but it
would be a shame to downgrade the window manager just because people
tend to misinterpret misleading benchmarks.
If the new algorithm is a win, go for it. But we all know that the
use-case described by the benchmark does not even have exotic quality
and there's nothing to learn from the results, except that it's too easy
to catch people with meaningless statements.
More information about the Xfce4-dev