New file manager (WAS Re: xffm)
spamrefuse at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 2 03:56:06 CET 2005
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi Edscott, everybody,
> edscott wilson garcia wrote:
>> So I'd say, "use rox and wait until 4.3.1 to give
>> the xffm iconview a try".
> Ok, I tend to disagree. I don't think xffm should
> become any more complex. I mean, it's already far
> too complex.
> What I'd love to see is a very basic simple icon
> view based file
> manager, to tree view, no plugins, no samba, no
> nothing but simple file
> Ideally, I think it should be started from scratch,
> and designed from
> the ground up with both user interface and code
> maintainability in mind.
> Create the necessary GTK widgets (only if needed),
> keep the code simple
> and clear, etc.
> I would also love to see others developers take part
> of it - I would
> myself like to help if possible.
> And if you want my point, this should be the only
> strong goal of Xfce
> 4.4. That's why I'd like to see as many devs
> involved as possible. Let's
> put all of our (little) energy in this.
Hi Xfce development gurus,
As a long-term user of Xfce (but an outsider when it
comes to development of Xfce), I fear that Xfce is
gradually moving towards a kind of bulkiness that
reminds me of KDE or Gnome style WM.
I expect Xfce to be small and fast.
Xfce should manage my windows and stuff; I don't need
an xf-terminal (i've got already xterm, rxvt,...),
I also don't need an editor (I already use nedit),
neither do I need a file manager (I've got rox for
that), and so on and so on.
To some extend such choices have been made for, for
example, the screen-saver; xfce uses xscreensaver,
instead of writing its own. I think that is more the
way to go.
Ah, well, that's my 2cents.
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo!
More information about the Xfce4-dev