goodies-management
Wit Wilinski
madman at linux.bydg.org
Mon Aug 15 13:55:47 CEST 2005
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:39:19 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann <info at sten-net.de> wrote:
> --
> That's the way we'd prefer. There'd be lots of advantages (goodies
> remain as sources, downloads are smaller, there's much lower effort in
> providing goodies to the goodies manager etc.)
>
Well... if it'd be possible to _avoid_ downloading autoconf/automake
data (especially the configure script) downloads would be even more
light ;) What do You think about a common build system for all the
goodies, without the need for autoconf/automake thing?
Plugin tarballs could have a very simple internal structure (src/,
images/, data/, po/ for example). The manager would check if necessary
dependencies are satisfied, compile and link the sources, compile
translations and install everything to appropriate directories. The
tarball could contain some simple hints for the goodie-manager to tell
it what to do (if the plugin needs some extra things)
--
[ JID: madman at jabber.autocom.pl ] [ http://madman.2ya.com ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20050815/752b9300/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list