svn?

[Edscott Wilson Garcia]

El lun, 04-04-2005 a las 15:05 +0200, Jean-François Wauthy escribió:
> Le lundi 04 avril 2005 à 07:00 -0500, Edscott Wilson Garcia a écrit :
> > El sáb, 02-04-2005 a las 14:12 +0200, Benedikt Meurer escribió:
> > > Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> > > > xfce4-core/libxfce4gui/trunk
> > > > xfce4-core/libxfce4gui/branches
> > > > xfce4-core/libxfce4gui/tags
> > > > ...
> > > > xfce4-core/xfwm4/trunk
> > > > xfce4-core/xfwm4/branches
> > > > xfce4-core/xfwm4/tags
> > > > ...
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-pizza-plugin/trunk
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-pizza-plugin/branches
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-pizza-plugin/tags
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-biteme-plugin/trunk
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-biteme-plugin/branches
> > > > xfce4-panel-plugins/xfce4-biteme-plugin/tags
> > > > ...
> > > > xfmedia/trunk
> > > > xfmedia/branches
> > > > xfmedia/tags
> > > > mousepad/trunk
> > > > mousepad/branches
> > > > mousepad/tags
> > > > xfc/trunk
> > > > xfc/branches
> > > > xfc/tags
> > > > ...
> > > > (Olivier?  Benny, since he has the most experience with svn I believe?)
> > > 
> > > I'm still against the xfce4-core, xfce4-panel-plugins toplevel 
> > > categories; my vote goes to a consistent layout.
> > 
> > This answer is too late, but FWIW, I agree entirely with Benny here.
> > 
> don't worry the layout Auke set up is without toplevel categories, see
> http://svn.foo-projects.org/svn/xfce/
> 

Ah, cool. I wonder if we need to keep support for 4.0 branch (xffm-icons
disappeared with 4.2) ...

regards,

Edscott

-- 
Edscott Wilson Garcia <edscott at xfce.org>