biju_chacko at vsnl.net
Wed Sep 22 12:08:04 CEST 2004
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> i'm not too fond of adding a fourth number either. perhaps bump them
> all up to the highest version number? though that's something like
> 4.1.25. or maybe bump them all up to 4.1.90? for the dev cycle, the
> version numbers are largely meaningless; just a way for us to make sure
> packages have good dependencies when we add something to a library that
> another package requires. now that most things are frozen now, APIs
> should be stable, so a 4.1.90 scheme might work well.
I'm afraid I didn't quite understand that ... could you elaborate?
More information about the Xfce4-dev