xfmedia 0.1.0 released
Olivier Fourdan
fourdan at xfce.org
Tue Oct 26 23:00:23 CEST 2004
Hi
For you own use, at home, yes, you can do whatever you want, even break
your system, nobody will complain.
But in corporate environments, people usually stick with older versions.
For example, the recent RHEL 3.0 still ships with gtk 2.2 and upgrading
this can cause trouble.
Xfce is not such a big project, so it has to adapt to others rather than
forcing others to adapt to Xfce.
I hope that makes sense to you, if not, I won't try to argue.
Cheers,
Olivier.
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:48 -0400, James Golden a.k.a. Chibi wrote:
> Meh. I don't understand why some people insist on sticking in the past
> when there is nothing wrong with the current. Just upgrade your GTK, ya
> nut. :P This is like XMMS sticking with GTK1.x, while others want gtk2.x
> support and starting the superior BMP. Upgrading a library -isn't- that
> hard, and I realise while XFCE is being developed not to rely on
> anything above 2.2, the person compiling the program they want to use
> has no reason /not/ to upgrade. I seriously don't understand this
> sticking behind thing. Open Source software is not developed on
> commercial environments that change their libraries just a little bit
> every 5 years, It's a constantly changing, endlessly improving place
> where there's something new and improved every day. If a change is bad,
> it's pointed out, and the developers can quickly go back..
>
> ..Guh. I could understand under the circumstance that GTK ports for
> other platforms are behind... But are they? I'm pretty certain even GTK
> for windows is at 2.4
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list