[Bug 447] oddities with un-iconifiable windows
Brian J. Tarricone
bjt23 at cornell.edu
Tue Nov 2 11:51:24 CET 2004
- Previous message: xfce-4.1.91 & Virtual screen
- Next message: [Xfce4-commits] CVS: xfce4/xfwm4/src client.c, 1.443, 1.444 events.c, 1.279, 1.280 focus.c, 1.28, 1.29 focus.h, 1.10, 1.11 settings.c, 1.115, 1.116 settings.h, 1.45, 1.46
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>PS: Brian, I'm missing the 'NOTABUG' option, what's the best in that case, does
>'INVALID' apply?
>
just in case anyone else was wondering too... yeah, INVALID covers
NOTABUG. essentially INVALID works for reports that aren't actually
bugs, or reports that are symptoms of bugs in other software (something
we especially see somewhat frequently). note that in the case of a bug
report filed on a bug that is fixed in a later version, you'd either use
DUPLICATE (if it was reported before), or WORKSFORME (if not). WONTFIX
should be used in cases where it is indeed a bug (or perhaps just
undesired behavior), but you've decided not to fix it because it would,
for example, break other things, or require a lengthy redesign that's
not worth the effort. note that if you don't want to fix a bug because
you're lazy, leave it open and add the "helpwanted" keyword to the bug.
if i have time sometime, i might add a NOTABUG resolution, though i need
to check and make sure i'm doing it properly, which might be
non-trivial, so don't hold your breath ^_~.
-brian
- Previous message: xfce-4.1.91 & Virtual screen
- Next message: [Xfce4-commits] CVS: xfce4/xfwm4/src client.c, 1.443, 1.444 events.c, 1.279, 1.280 focus.c, 1.28, 1.29 focus.h, 1.10, 1.11 settings.c, 1.115, 1.116 settings.h, 1.45, 1.46
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list