Dropped doxygen

[edscott wilson garcia]

El jue, 12-02-2004 a las 06:26, Olivier FOURDAN escribió:

> Dunno. Most projetct don't even put configure and Makefile.in in CVS, and let people generate them. The pro of this is that we don't care about what libtool/autoconf/automake versions we have, only the release manager should take care of generating the right files for release inclusion.
> 
> The cons seems fairly obvious to me, a lot less people are able to try the CVS version, since most people won't bother doing the necessary steps to achive compilation of the sources fetched from CVS.
> 
> So it's a good time for discuss that IMO:
> 
> 1) Do we include configure, Makefiles and docbook documentation in CVS
> 2) Do we exclude them all

My $0.02, exclude them all. Maybe a quickly rotating release scheme for
the development tree could provide even more testers than CVS.  

> 3) Shouldn't we switch to subversion ? :)
> 

I'm with you whatever you decide, if you are sure. 

regards

Edscott

> (Ok, question #3 is definitely another matter :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Olivier.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>