xffm issues

Juraj Ziegler e at hq.sk
Mon May 5 23:08:30 CEST 2003

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:31:11PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 22:21, Juraj Ziegler wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:02:24PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > ps. sorry, no time right now to compile by hand and test CVS versions ;-/
> Unfortunately reporting bugs on devel snapshots that are ~3 weeks old is
> fairly useless.

Yeah, you are right.

> xfce4 is still under heavy developpment, so the code changes every day.

But I still do not know, whether it has been fixed, or not. If it's
fixed, I have no reason to d/l the CVS version and check it, I would
just wait for a newer version to appear in Debian. If, on the other
hand, it has _not_ been fixed yet, I might try to find some time to
check it, or maybe even take a look at it.

With all respect, is saying "yes", or "no", or "sorry, I'm not sure"
that hard?


>e at hq.sk<                   /(bb|[^b]{2})/                 >http://hq.sk/~euro<
        "always know what you say, but do not always say what you know"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20030505/659f8680/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list