xffm issues
Juraj Ziegler
e at hq.sk
Mon May 5 23:08:30 CEST 2003
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:31:11PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 22:21, Juraj Ziegler wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:02:24PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > ps. sorry, no time right now to compile by hand and test CVS versions ;-/
>
> Unfortunately reporting bugs on devel snapshots that are ~3 weeks old is
> fairly useless.
Yeah, you are right.
> xfce4 is still under heavy developpment, so the code changes every day.
But I still do not know, whether it has been fixed, or not. If it's
fixed, I have no reason to d/l the CVS version and check it, I would
just wait for a newer version to appear in Debian. If, on the other
hand, it has _not_ been fixed yet, I might try to find some time to
check it, or maybe even take a look at it.
With all respect, is saying "yes", or "no", or "sorry, I'm not sure"
that hard?
[e]
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
>e at hq.sk< /(bb|[^b]{2})/ >http://hq.sk/~euro<
"always know what you say, but do not always say what you know"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20030505/659f8680/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list