james at tappin.me.uk
Sun Mar 16 08:29:50 CET 2003
On 14 Mar 2003 19:18:06 -0500
Joe Klemmer <klemmerj at webtrek.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 16:28, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > Now that's a take it or leave it offer. I you don't like that, use
> > whatever you want, but don't ask for a standard coding style then.
> My coding style is slightly different. It goes like this -
> IDENTIFICATION DEVISION.
> PROGRAM-ID. TEN.
> ENVIRONMENT DEVISION.
> CONFIGURATION SECTION.
> INPUT-OUTPUT SECTION.
> DATA DIVISION.
> FILE SECTION.
> WORKING-STORAGE SECTION.
> 01 COUNTER PIC X.
> PROCEDURE DIVISION.
> MOVE 1 TO COUNTER
> PERFORM UNTIL COUNTER = 10
> DISPLAY COUNTER
> ADD 1 TO COUNTER
> I just wish there were come COBOL binding for gtk. ;-)
I prefer something more like:
DO 10 I = 1, 10
400 FORMAT(1H ,I3)
But there's no FORTRAN bindings either :-(
[Sorry couldn't resist that one]
James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using
james at tappin.me.uk -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering
http://www.tappin.me.uk/ with data loss in it I fancy"
More information about the Xfce4-dev