failed to compile
dwhitener at defeet.com
Mon Jun 2 14:56:15 CEST 2003
My box is a stock rh9 install straight off the cd and the install was flawless.
Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> Hey Peeter,
> I'm quite sure people have compiled it on RH9. If the .la file is not
> installed, I don't believe that should be a problem unless something
> specifically depends on it.
> I almost sounds as if something was compiled when the .la was available
> and now it has been removed. Just guessing, though.
> Anyone using RH9 can confirm that it works (or not)?
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:23:32 +0300
> Peeter Vois <Peeter.Vois at mail.ee> wrote:
>>I did scan the packages on CD. No library with extension .la in the
>>packages. Ok, looks like RH9 users can not compile XFCE4 without
>>tricks. Still I was able to compile XFCE4 about month ago on RH9.
>>(Because of this I did upgrade my system).
>>Best Regards ...
>>rpm -qpl /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm
>>rpm -qpl /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/glib2-devel-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm
>>Ühel ilusal kenal päeval Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:25:29 +0200
>>Jasper Huijsmans <jasper at moongroup.com> kirjutas:
>>>On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:14:45 +0300
>>>Peeter Vois <Peeter.Vois at mail.ee> wrote:
>>>>A hour ago I did download xfce4-cvs-snapshot and tried to compile
>>>>its contents. libxfcegui4 failed to build (error log at the end).
>>>>I have RH9 based gtk-(devel-)2.2 libraries installed, and a month
>>>>ago I did succeed to compile xfce4.
>>>Looking at the output, it seems it is missing libgobject, which is
>>>weird, since it is part of glib-2. Try reinstalling that. It doesn't
>>>look like an xfce problem to me at first glance.
>>>[useful output skipped]
>>>Xfce4-dev mailing list
>>>Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
>>Xfce4-dev mailing list
>>Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
More information about the Xfce4-dev