FAT tarball

[edscott wilson garcia]

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 02:52, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Brad,
> 
> Don't change anything to your ebuilds! The "fat" tarballs are just a
> convenient method for me to deal with SF.net way of managing files.
> 
> Each tarball contains the inividual packages. Mirror are providing
> inividial packages as well. 

Oops. Ok. Now we are @ linux.imp.mx. Routes:
http://linux.imp.mx/xfce4/rc1/xfce4-rc1/src
http://linux.imp.mx/xfce4/rc1/xfce4-rc1/srpm
http://linux.imp.mx/xfce4/rc1/xfce4-rc1/rpm/rh8
http://linux.imp.mx/xfce4/rc1/xfce4-rc1/rpm/rh9

> 
> Cheers,
> Olivier.
> 
> On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 05:46, Brad Cowan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >   I'm wondering if this "FAT" tarball is going to be the new preferred
> > release method?  If so I'm going to have to break down the tarball and
> > use Gentoo's resources as a mirror for each package instead of being
> > able to rely on a much bigger base like SF. This new method just broke
> > all my ebuilds :((  Also I just got the go ahead to add an xfce-base and
> > xfce-extra categories to the top-level of our tree putting your
> > wonderful project in a league with kde and gnome :), but I need to know
> > what release method is going to be used before I have to redo all my
> > ebuilds again.
> > 
> > Thanks,