rebuilding tarballs? (was: Re: xfce4-mixer updated)

[Olivier Fourdan]

Hi JAsper,

Well, the point is that RC1 could become the final if no bug is found:
That's the theory. 

In practice, if we leave bugs in RC1, then we "know" that there will be
a RC1, so RC1 should be really beta3....

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 21:41, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 16:11:40 +0200
> Jasper Huijsmans <jasper at moongroup.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 12 Jul 2003 08:58:43 -0500
> > edscott wilson garcia <edscott at imp.mx> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > A rebuild of the xffm tarball would be good too because yesterday I
> > > fixed an abort condition when the "open with" is used && !xffm.reg  
> > > 
> > 
> > Right, Olivier, should I update more/all modules?
> > 
> > E.g, I updated credits in xfce-utils as well + a small bug in
> > xftaskbar4...
> > 
> > We can't keep doing this, though. What's your opinion?
> > 
> 
> Olivier? 
> 
> Personally, I'd rather not change anything at this stage.
> 
>  	Jasper
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
-- 
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
http://www.xfce.org