XFFM & XFDESKTOP never built -- the situation is unchanged

[Olivier Fourdan]

Lenny,

Can you retry again those two specific tarballs?

http://www.xfce.org/archive/xffm.tar.bz2
http://www.xfce.org/archive/xfdesktop.tar.bz2

And you can forget about CVS, it's lagging behind.

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 16:53, lenny bruce wrote:
> The updates to the CVS versions of XFFM and XFDESKTOP
> produced exactly the same results I sent
> when I tried the version Oliver Fourdan recommended.
> I did "find differences" and the cvs build was identical
> to the files I mailed to you in this e-mail:
> 
> At 2:02 AM -0700 6/29/03, lenny bruce wrote:
> >At 8:04 PM +0200 6/28/03, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> >>Lenny,
> >>
> >>Can you try these two packages:
> >>
> >>http://www.xfce.org/archive/xffm.tar.bz2
> >>http://www.xfce.org/archive/xfdesktop.tar.bz2
> >
> >they got significantly further than the CVS versions...
> >
> >but no dice
> 
> where I attached files titled
> 
> "new-xfdesktop.txt.gz" and "new-xffm.txt.gz"
> 
> 
> XFFM & XFDESKTOP never built -- the situation is unchanged
> 
> 
> I think it's a tiny bug relating to version numbers and competing references.
> I noticed libraries being created with 0.0.0 version numbers.
> 
> relevant information about Mac OS X (Darwin) library version numbers
> can be found here at http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/shared.php
> 
> it's some minor thing that can be added to affect Mac OS X (Darwin) only...
> the Fink Project people do it all the time and also pass the code upstream.
-- 
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
http://www.xfce.org