XFFM & XFDESKTOP never built -- the situation is unchanged

lenny bruce keeptruthfree at earthlink.net
Mon Jul 7 16:53:07 CEST 2003


The updates to the CVS versions of XFFM and XFDESKTOP
produced exactly the same results I sent
when I tried the version Oliver Fourdan recommended.
I did "find differences" and the cvs build was identical
to the files I mailed to you in this e-mail:

At 2:02 AM -0700 6/29/03, lenny bruce wrote:
>At 8:04 PM +0200 6/28/03, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>>Lenny,
>>
>>Can you try these two packages:
>>
>>http://www.xfce.org/archive/xffm.tar.bz2
>>http://www.xfce.org/archive/xfdesktop.tar.bz2
>
>they got significantly further than the CVS versions...
>
>but no dice

where I attached files titled

"new-xfdesktop.txt.gz" and "new-xffm.txt.gz"


XFFM & XFDESKTOP never built -- the situation is unchanged


I think it's a tiny bug relating to version numbers and competing references.
I noticed libraries being created with 0.0.0 version numbers.

relevant information about Mac OS X (Darwin) library version numbers
can be found here at http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/shared.php

it's some minor thing that can be added to affect Mac OS X (Darwin) only...
the Fink Project people do it all the time and also pass the code upstream.

-- 
lenny bruce                        I am not a comedian,
keeptruthfree at earthlink.net        I am Lenny Bruce.



More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list