netllama at linux-sxs.org
Wed Jan 29 05:22:13 CET 2003
On 01/28/03 20:13, Biju Chacko wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 21:35, Chuck Mead wrote:
>> And yes you are correct it is the sf end of the connection which is high
>> latency and that is why I would like it if we did not have to suffer
>> through their problems. At least if something were to happen to it while
>> we were doing our own cvs we could influence the outcome. As it is we
>> are slaves to the situation of the moment at sf.
> My main concern is that sf is run by a company that is bleeding money
> and isn't really interested in open source anymore.
Even if VA did go belly up, SF.net (and OSDN as a whole) isn't going to
disapear with it. Its way too good of a marketing resource. OSDN is
the only division of VA that is profitable. I'd hazard a guess that IBM
would snap it up if the opportunity arose.
L. Friedman netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
8:20pm up 15 days, 3:48, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.09
More information about the Xfce4-dev