sourceforge cvs

Net Llama! netllama at
Wed Jan 29 05:22:13 CET 2003

On 01/28/03 20:13, Biju Chacko wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 21:35, Chuck Mead wrote:
>> And yes you are correct it is the sf end of the connection which is high
>> latency and that is why I would like it if we did not have to suffer
>> through their problems. At least if something were to happen to it while
>> we were doing our own cvs we could influence the outcome. As it is we
>> are slaves to the situation of the moment at sf.
> My main concern is that sf is run by a company that is bleeding money
> and isn't really interested in open source anymore.

Even if VA did go belly up, (and OSDN as a whole) isn't going to 
disapear with it.  Its way too good of a marketing resource.  OSDN is 
the only division of VA that is profitable.  I'd hazard a guess that IBM 
would snap it up if the opportunity arose.

L. Friedman                       	       netllama at
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:

   8:20pm  up 15 days,  3:48,  1 user,  load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.09

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list