libtool 1.4.2
Benedikt Meurer
Benedikt.Meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de
Fri Feb 28 19:33:09 CET 2003
On Fri, 28, Feb 2003, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi Benny,
Hello Oliver,
> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 19:06, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > > (libtool 1.4.2 doesn't set "SED" variable which causes the configure
> > > script to fail)
> >
> > Which module?
>
> The libtool script itself fails. It's a known referenced problem as it
> seems.
Oh, I didn't know that.
I was going to settle all modules to libtool 1.4a (1.641.2.255 2001/05/22
10:39:30), because this version is know to work on most plattforms, whereas
newer libtool versions may cause trouble on several plattforms.
There was a discussion in NetBSD's pkgsrc some time ago to update libtool,
but it was stated, that this would break lots of packages on for example
NetBSD and Solaris.
I also realized, that libtool version 1.4.2 (1.922.2.54 2001/09/11 03:33:37),
as it was used in most modules before (and is still used in e.g. xffm)
failed several times for me, caused by errors in shell scripts. So I
thought it'd be better to have a stable and well tested libtool version.
What about thes "SED"-problem? Does it break the build of any of the
updated modules (libxfcegui4, libxfce4mcs, xfce-mcs-{manager,plugins})?
If you want me to, I'll undo the changes and settle the modules back to
using libtool 1.4.2 (1.922.2.54 2001/09/11 03:33:37). Sorry, I should
have asked before I commit such a change.
> Cheers,
> Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
regards,
Benedikt
--
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list