blargh

[tom]

Net Llama! said:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, tom wrote:

>> If free meant inferior, I wouldn't run FreeBSD.
>
> No, my point was, no one forced anyone to use it in the first place, and
> what most likely attracted Oliver & Co to sf.net was its cost (or lack
> thereof).  Complaining about a service which is being offered for free
> when there are alternatives seems a bit harsh to me.  And anyway,
> FreeBSD isnt' a service, its a product, so you're comparing apples to
> lobsters.

And my point was, free doesn't have to suck.
Who made a comparison?