jasper at moongroup.com
Mon Feb 24 10:30:47 CET 2003
As it is now, there are two schools of dialog design that are being used
for our mcs plugins:
1) Sections are grouped by using frames with a normal header
2) Sections have a bold header and are separated by space or if deemed
necessary by a simple separator. There's no separator between dialog
and button area.
I have used the second type for te panel, and the xfdesktop dialogs,
while Olivier used the first type for all others. Edscott copied the
panel dialog design for xffm.
I think we should at least try to have a common look for the dialogs.
Obviously I would prefer the second style, but I can live with using
frames if everyone feels that is better.
I got my ideas for the dialog from the GNOME HIG. There are also some
o They also indent the options in a section by two spaces. This feels
rather unnecessary to me.
o They use much more space between and around the widgets. Their default
spacing is 12, whereas I use 6. I use 6 mainly because this seems to be
the default border in gtk dialogs. This way the widgets line up nicely
with the dialog buttons.
I am volunteering to change all dialogs to use 'my' dialog style if you
are happy to let me have my way :) I am also prepared to change my
dialogs the other way around, although with pain in my heart ...
So, I'd say my preference is clear, what is your opinion?
More information about the Xfce4-dev