recent xffm changes

[Olivier Fourdan]

Why do we need a monitor after all ?

When copying /moving/removing/renaming a file, we know that the status
has changed. For all other cases, a reload button would suffice. 

That would make things much simpler and lighter on CPU.

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 19:35, edscott wilson garcia wrote:
> El jue, 13-02-2003 a las 10:25, Jens Luedicke escribió:
> > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 05:29, edscott wilson garcia wrote:
> > 
> > > DONE: trash needs to load like other dir (expand only after loaded)
> > > DONE: needs "disable monitor" in options
> > > DONE: needs hide wastebaskets 
> > 
> > The Wastebasket is shown again after the file monitor
> > reloaded the current dir. 
> 
> Fixed in cvs.
> 
> > 
> > If I'm not totally wrong, the file monitor (and its timeouts)
> > causes another GUI issue: The menubar item-titles become 'white'
> > after a short time when you browse/select its menu items.
> 
> I was wondering what was causing that... In order to fix it we need to
> be able to know when the menu is open (so we can tell the monitor to
> hold still). Anybody know how to test if a main menus is open?
> 
> Edscott
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jens Luedicke <jens at irs-net.com>
> > 
> > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with
> > substance."
> > --Sam Brown
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce4-dev mailing list
> > Xfce4-dev at moongroup.com
> > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at moongroup.com
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
-- 
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
http://www.xfce.org