xfnautilus

[gardnerj at provide.net]

On 13 Nov 2002 15:43:59 -0600
 edscott wilson garcia <edscott at imp.mx> wrote:
> El mié, 13-11-2002 a las 14:58, Joe Klemmer escribió:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Moritz Heiber wrote:
> > 
> > > > Why not simply call it "xfile"?
> > > > I think, that what it is for: managing files
> (local, network).
> > > 
> > > Sounds good to me :)
> > 
> > 	That's actually not bad at all.  Maybe xffile or
> xffiler...  Nah, 
> > they look unwieldy.  xfile or maybe xfiler would be
> fine.
> 
> No real hurry though, until a release comes through. BTW,
> xfwhatever now
> has fast file sorting independent of the gtk sorting
> (which is real slow
> on xftree2). 
> 
> Edscott
> 

After watching this thread for some time, the xfile name
does stand out as both easy to say and having a cute double
meaning of sorts. Of course it's simple enough a name that
somebody somewhere might already be using it for something
(and I mean other than a TV show).

Of course if it all gets too frustrating you could call it:

xfitall -- short for "x-f* it all, you know what this is!"

Cheers,
Jonathan