Xfce4 & ROX
Jasper Huijsmans
j.b.huijsmans at hetnet.nl
Wed Jun 26 09:46:19 CEST 2002
At 01:27 PM 6/24/02 -0400, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Just a quick question; is ROX going to be an integral part of
>XFce4? Will it run as expected without it? I think ROX is a very good
>set of programs but I don't run any of them. If XFce4 is going to have
>part of it's functionality handled by them it would probably be good to
>get ready for that.
Olivier, do you have any opinions on this? Maybe it's still too early to say
and you first want to stabilize xfwm4 (it already is) and xfce4 (that
definitely isn't ;-).
BTW, progress on xfce4 will be a bit slow, because I am in the process of
writing a PhD thesis and have all kinds of deadlines to make. I do xfce4 for
relaxation, but I don't know if I'll have time for much of that.
Jasper
>- --
>Attention all planets of the Solar Federation.
>We have assumed control.
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>iD8DBQE9F1acHeWRPx8OIHARAp+gAJsFQjjE8SgjupgCquGIypdLT0fc4gCfVoQw
>pKIY1XuTOaUsW7lDwr8Ri4I=
>=4nZB
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xfce4-dev mailing list
>Xfce4-dev at moongroup.com
>http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list