Xfce is very slow, part 2
Allin Cottrell
cottrell at wfu.edu
Tue Jan 14 19:45:33 CET 2014
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> 4. C) Really bad HDD performance: my HDD is the newest part of the PC
> $>sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda
> [sudo] password for haase:
> smartctl 6.2 2013-04-20 r3812 [i686-linux-3.11.0-15-generic] (local build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
[snip]
You got some uninformed noise in response to your HDD information. See
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Howto_ReadSmartctlReports_ATA
for how to read such reports. In fact there's no indication of trouble in
your report (though a firmware update may be a good thing).
Here are the lines that someone said were problematic:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 118 099 006
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 077 060 030
The thing is the _small_ values are bad here (a value less than THRESH is
considered a failure). Your values are perfectly healthy.
> $>free
> Gesamt Belegt Frei Gemeinsam Puffer Cached
> Speicher: 1018104 905188 112916 0 191836 360764
> -/+ Puffer/Cache: 352588 665516
> Auslagerungsdatei: 1052220 175804 876416
This seems more relevant: you have about 90% of RAM in use and are well
into swap. With your system in that position I can see that it might take
a while to start up another big application. Maybe you're running
something that's gradually leaking memory.
Allin Cottrell
More information about the Xfce
mailing list